Media Clash Intensifies 45 Days Before the Midterm Elections

U.S. President Donald Trump announced that he would immediately ban CNN, MS NOW, and the political news outlet Politico from the White House. President Trump also warned that more outlets could be added to the list, claiming these media organizations have been reporting “fake news” about him and his administration. Just ahead of the November midterm elections, Trump has decided to take a hardline stance against mainstream media outlets critical of him.

U.S. President Donald Trump. The White House

U.S. President Donald Trump. The White House

View original image

On the 18th (local time), President Trump declared on his social media platform, Truth Social, “I am immediately banning fake news CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House.” He added, “Media outlets should not continually publish fiction and lies about the President of the United States, the Trump administration, or America.”


However, even after Trump's announcement, CNN reporters continued their work in the White House press area. The CNN team was also part of the TV pool assigned to Vice President JD Vance’s schedule on that day. It could not be immediately confirmed whether the White House had actually revoked these outlets’ press credentials or taken steps to remove them from the press area.


Later in the afternoon, President Trump met with reporters in the Oval Office and, when asked about the reason for the ban, he replied, “Because they are fake news.” He claimed these outlets intentionally run negative stories to weaken him and the Republican administration.


When questioned about which specific reports triggered the ban, President Trump did not cite any particular article. Instead, he referred to reporting from “the past two years,” arguing that these outlets had maintained negative coverage during that period.


Trump also did not provide details on how the ban would be enforced. He stated, “I don’t want them in my office. I don’t want them here at all,” and added, “The ban will be as broad as possible.” However, he suggested that the ban could be lifted if those media organizations change their approach to coverage in the future.


CNN and Politico immediately pushed back. CNN issued a statement supporting its White House press corps and asserted that the U.S. Constitution guarantees journalists the right to report without government interference. Politico declared it would continue to cover the White House and future administrations, and would respond to any attempts to restrict press rights as protected by the First Amendment.


U.S. press freedom organizations also raised the possibility of legal disputes if the ban were implemented. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press stated that the White House cannot exclude certain outlets from news coverage simply because it disapproves of their reporting content or perspective. The First Amendment protections for freedom of expression and the press could become central issues in any ensuing dispute.


President Trump indicated that media organizations beyond CNN, MS NOW, and Politico could also be banned. He specifically mentioned The New York Times and The Washington Post, criticizing both outlets.


This latest measure comes as President Trump has repeatedly clashed with critical media throughout his presidency.


Previously, during his first term in 2018, President Trump revoked the press credentials of CNN's White House correspondent, Jim Acosta. After Acosta engaged in a heated exchange with Trump at a press conference and the White House seized his pass, CNN filed a lawsuit. A federal court found the White House's action violated due process and temporarily restored Acosta’s access, after which the White House issued his credentials again.


In 2025, the Associated Press engaged in legal conflict with the Trump administration over White House press restrictions. Following an executive order from President Trump directing that the Gulf of Mexico be called “Gulf of America,” the White House restricted AP reporters from covering presidential events and traveling on Air Force One because AP continued to use the original name in its reporting.


A federal court ruled that the government cannot restrict press access based on an outlet’s viewpoint. However, on appeal, the court recognized a broader scope for the White House to determine press access to the President and journalists. Related lawsuits are ongoing.


The Trump administration’s conflict with major news organizations has gone beyond access disputes and has led to legal battles with broadcasting companies as well. In August of this year, Disney and ABC sued after the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) moved to review ABC-affiliated stations’ broadcast licenses ahead of schedule. Disney argued that this action infringes upon press rights guaranteed by the First Amendment.



President Trump left open the possibility of further press bans during the day. As a result, there may be ongoing legal battles over the scope and targets of any actual restrictions and whether such actions violate the First Amendment.


This content was produced with the assistance of AI translation services.

© The Asia Business Daily. All rights reserved. Unauthorized AI training and use prohibited.

Today’s Briefing