Supreme Court Receives Final Appeal Case on Property Division Between Chey Tae-won and So-young Roh
Director Roh’s Side Yet to Submit Incidental Appeal
The Supreme Court has received a case in which SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won filed a final appeal against the ruling in the retrial on property division with Arts Center Nabi Director So-young Roh.
Chairman Chey Tae-won of SK Group (left) and Director No So-young of Art Center Nabi are heading to the courtroom to attend the second hearing of the property division retrial at the Seoul Central District Court in Seocho-gu, Seoul on June 26. Photo by Yonhap News
View original imageAccording to the legal community on September 18, the Supreme Court received the property division case between Chairman Chey and Director Roh on the 14th of this month.
Earlier, Chairman Chey's side filed a final appeal on August 14 against the Seoul High Court's retrial ruling, which ordered him to pay Director Roh 944 billion won in cash. However, they have since submitted a petition to narrow the scope of the appeal, stating that they will dispute only 244 billion won out of the original amount, excluding 700 billion won.
As the amount under dispute decreased, the court fee—an acceptance fee for filing the lawsuit, initially expected to reach several billion won—has been set at around 850 million won.
Hot Picks Today
"I Don't Want to Marry a Salaried Man"... Women Flock to 'This Place' to Find Husbands Amid the AI Boom
- "I thought getting into a big company was the goal"... The 'position' only 1 in 121 employees reaches
- "Jealous of Koreans" - Now a Must-Do on Every Trip... The Place Where Foreigners Spent KRW 229.8 Billion
- "'No! Dad, Run!'... Father Moved by 5-Year-Old Son Who Shielded Him from Ghost at Korean Folk Village"
- "Please Let Me Go Home"... Customers Trapped in Department Store Parking Lot for 5 Hours Vent Their Anger
Meanwhile, it has been reported that Director Roh’s side has not yet submitted an incidental appeal. An incidental appeal is a system whereby, if one party files an appeal, the other party may simultaneously challenge parts of the original judgment that are disadvantageous to them.
© The Asia Business Daily. All rights reserved. Unauthorized AI training and use prohibited.