Prosecutors Decide Not to Indict Noh So-young's Lawyer Over "Chey Tae-won Spent 100 Billion Won on Cohabitant" Remarks
Insufficient Evidence Concluded After Police Referral and Supplementary Investigation
The prosecutors have decided not to indict the legal representative of So-young Noh, Director of Art Center Nabi, who had been sued for defamation after Chae-won Chey, Chairman of SK Group, claimed that he had spent over 100 billion won on a cohabitant.
Taewon Chey, Chairman of SK Group, and Soyoung Roh, Director of Art Center Nabi. Photo by Yonhap News.
View original imageAccording to the legal community on September 11, the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office recently made a non-indictment decision for Lawyer A, who had been sued for defamation by spreading false information, due to insufficient evidence on September 10. It is reported that the prosecution determined Lawyer A’s remarks were somewhat substantiated and thus could not be considered as spreading false information, and that Chae-won Chey’s side did not provide sufficient grounds to refute the claim.
Lawyer A was sued by Chae-won Chey after stating to reporters in November 2023, during So-young Noh’s alimony lawsuit against Hee Young Kim, Chairperson of the T&C Foundation and cohabitant of Chae-won Chey, that “Chey has spent more than 100 billion won on Kim since at least 2015.”
Hot Picks Today
"They're Coming After My Pension Too?" Public Unease Mounts... Spain Sees Mass Protest Over Reform Push
- "300,000 Won Grant" Shelved at Chuseok to Go to All Residents After All... This City Says It Will Pay Before Lunar New Year
- Jeong Jeomsik: "Blue House only needs to clarify whether First Lady played golf"... Special inspector's first task
- "Why Is That Woman Acting Like That?" Wailing and Lying Down... A Disturbance in the Middle of Gangnam-daero
- "Stockpile 9 Liters of Bottled Water and Three Days' Worth of Food"... UK on Edge as Nationwide Emergency Preparedness Alert Issued
At the time, the police concluded that the charges were substantiated and referred the case to the prosecution. However, the prosecution determined that further investigation into the basis of the remarks was necessary and requested a supplementary investigation. After a reinvestigation, the police re-referred the case, but the prosecution ultimately found no grounds for the charges.
© The Asia Business Daily. All rights reserved. Unauthorized AI training and use prohibited.