Justice Minister Jeong Seongho Submits Resignation: "Prosecution Reform Requires Thorough Review of Unprepared Areas"
Major Prosecution Reform Legislation Completed, Citing Health Deterioration as Reason
Justice Minister Jeong Seongho has submitted his resignation, stating that major legislative reforms related to prosecution reform have been completed and that his health has deteriorated.
According to the legal community on August 19, Minister Jeong submitted his resignation to the presidential office and the Ministry of Personnel Management in the afternoon of the previous day. After submitting his resignation, Minister Jeong explained the reasons on his personal social media, citing "health reasons" as well as the completion of major legislation regarding prosecution reform. He stated, "I believe that the new criminal justice system should be completed under new leadership."
He added, "I will return to the National Assembly and do my best for the success of the government based on popular sovereignty, and furthermore, for the success of the Republic of Korea and its people. I will also contribute to providing stable support to state affairs and building a trusted Democratic Party."
He also emphasized that earning public trust is essential for sustainable reform. He stated, "The success of prosecution reform depends on the empathy and trust of members of society," adding, "Many people, including experts, the media, and crime victims, are concerned about the Criminal Procedure Act, which is scheduled to be implemented soon."
Hot Picks Today
"Shares Soar 600% on Debut as Retail Investors Flock to 'Robot Company'"
- "Chinese Tourists Say 'We're Not Going Anymore' as South Koreans Fill the Gap... Japan's Tourism Thrives Instead"
- "They Underestimated 'Cheap Coffee,' but Now It's Serious... MegaMGC Coffee Catches Up with Starbucks"
- Taiwan to Distribute NT$10,000 per Citizen as AI Industry Boom Pays Off
- "Ssangyong C&E to Leave Seoul Headquarters With 120 Staff and Move to Donghae City... First Major Gamble in 60 Years"
He continued, "Any anticipated trial and error or side effects should be addressed even before the law takes effect. Any problems discovered after the law is implemented should be addressed humbly and promptly, rather than being considered anti-reform hostility. We also need to objectively examine whether there are still areas that are not fully prepared."
© The Asia Business Daily. All rights reserved. Unauthorized AI training and use prohibited.