Prosecutors' Future Committee Investigation Team Denied Access to Kim Yong's Trial Records by Supreme Court
Investigation Team: "Review of Prosecution's Evidence Records Needed"
Plans to Supplement Reasons for Access and Reapply
The Truth Investigation Team of the Prosecutors' Committee for Human Rights and Future, which is investigating allegations of prosecutorial abuse of investigative powers, applied to the Supreme Court for access to the trial records of the case involving Kim Yong, former Deputy Director of the Institute for Democracy. However, the request was denied. The investigation team stated that it plans to supplement the necessary reasons and reapply.
According to the legal community on July 9, the Supreme Court's First Division (presiding Justice Seo Kyunghwan) rejected the Truth Investigation Team's request for cooperation in viewing and copying the trial records of the case involving former Deputy Director Kim the previous day. This decision came six days after the team requested access to the trial records related to Kim's alleged violations of the Political Funds Act and other charges on July 2.
The investigation team announced on this day that, "In accordance with the Supreme Prosecutors' Office guidelines related to the team's operations, we are in the process of securing investigation and trial records for seven selected cases via the Supreme Prosecutors' Office." The team added, "We also applied to the Supreme Court for access to and copying of records in Kim's case—which is currently ongoing at the Supreme Court—via the Supreme Prosecutors' Office."
The team stated, "We are unable to confirm the specific reasons why the Supreme Court denied access to and copying of the trial records." Nevertheless, it added, "For the performance of our related work, it is necessary to secure and review the prosecution's evidence records currently submitted to the court." The team also said, "We plan to specify the reasons why access and copying are necessary and reapply to the Supreme Court."
According to internal guidelines of the Supreme Prosecutors' Office regarding the operation of the investigation team, the team is permitted to collect and secure investigation and trial records, as well as related documents, if necessary.
However, there are criticisms both within and outside the prosecution that the investigation team lacks a legal basis for accessing the case records. Former chief prosecutors issued a joint statement the previous day, criticizing the team's activities as a significant interference in ongoing trials.
Hot Picks Today
"30,000 Won in Korea, 70,000 Won in Japan"—Koreans Fill Suitcases as Illegal Direct Purchases Soar
- "SK hynix Is Our Target"... Japanese Firm Bets 7 Trillion Won as Germany Competes for Investment [AIDC Era of Coexistence] ⑪
- Jeju 'False Closure of Missing Person Case' Sparks Political Concern... Opposition Calls to Stop Prosecution Office Disbandment
- "SG$70,000 by Age 17 for Every Childborn"... Singapore Unveils Drastic Measures as Fertility Rate Sinks to 0.87
- "Monster That Eats Gold" Turns Out to Be Real: Uproar in China as 5-Year-Old Swallows $7,500 Gold Bar, Sparking Questions About Family's Wealth
The Prosecutors' Committee for Human Rights and Future was launched on June 10 to uncover the truth about alleged human rights violations and abuse of prosecutorial power. The first round of investigations involves seven cases: the Ssangbangwool North Korea remittance case, the Daejang-dong case, the case involving former Deputy Director Kim Yong, the Wirye New Town case, the West Sea public official shooting case, the statistics manipulation case, and the alleged false reporting case involving "Yoon Suk Yeol defamation."
© The Asia Business Daily. All rights reserved. Unauthorized AI training and use prohibited.