U.S. Military: "Clear Violation of Ceasefire"... Airstrikes on Coastal Targets

U.S. Treasury: "Ban on Iranian Oil Sales Reimposed"

"U.S.-Iran Tensions Make Agreement Unlikely"

U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) Official Website

U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) Official Website

View original image

After Iran attacked a foreign merchant vessel transiting the Strait of Hormuz, the United States struck back against Iran on July 7 (local time). The U.S. also decided to maintain economic sanctions that were initially planned to be lifted under a memorandum of understanding (MOU) for a ceasefire between the two sides. Iran’s provocation occurred during the funeral period of the former Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, while hardline anti-U.S. factions had consolidated. With growing doubts over Iran’s willingness to end hostilities, there is now a pessimistic outlook that even the follow-up ceasefire negotiations scheduled for July 11 may not take place.

U.S. Launches Airstrikes on Iran and Reinstates Oil Sanctions...Retaliates for Merchant Vessel Attack

Associated Press Yonhap News

Associated Press Yonhap News

View original image

The United States Central Command (CENTCOM) released a statement saying, “U.S. forces have launched a series of strong attacks to impose significant costs on Iran for targeting and attacking a commercial vessel carrying innocent civilians in international waters.” CENTCOM further criticized, “Iran’s actions are unjustified, dangerous, and a clear violation of the ceasefire.” The U.S. military did not disclose the exact targets of its strikes. However, several foreign media outlets speculated that the airstrikes hit southern Iranian coastal regions such as Bandar Abbas and Qeshm Island.


The U.S. Department of the Treasury also reinstated a ban on the sale of Iranian crude oil. The Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced the immediate revocation of a general license that had temporarily permitted the production, delivery, and sale of Iranian crude oil, petrochemicals, and petroleum products. However, transactions already conducted under the previous license can be settled until 12:01 a.m. (U.S. Eastern Time) on July 17. The license had been issued on June 21 and initially permitted transactions until August 21.

U.S. Retaliates with Airstrikes and Sanctions for Iran's Hormuz Provocation... Follow-up Talks in Doubt (Comprehensive) View original image

As Iran continued to attack merchant vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, the United States responded with these strong measures. According to the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO), three merchant ships were struck in the area surrounding the Strait of Hormuz within a 24-hour period between July 6 and 7. The victims included a liquefied natural gas (LNG) carrier registered in Qatar and an oil tanker registered in Saudi Arabia. Both countries strongly protested by summoning the Iranian ambassadors, but the Iranian government refused to acknowledge responsibility.


The Iranian government, in turn, strongly objected to the U.S. airstrikes and sanctions. Immediately after the U.S. strikes, Iran’s Foreign Ministry issued a statement declaring, “We sternly warn of the consequences of the United States’ violation of MOU provisions and will take decisive actions to protect our national interests and security.”

During Khamenei’s Funeral...IRGC Provocation in the Strait of Hormuz

Associated Press Yonhap News Agency

Associated Press Yonhap News Agency

View original image

Some analysts believe that the recent Iranian attack was a unilateral military provocation by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). According to Iran’s state-run Press TV, President Masoud Pezeshkian of Iran was en route to Najaf, a Shia holy city in Iraq, along with key government officials to attend the funeral procession for Khamenei, but returned home after hearing of the U.S. airstrikes on Iran while still in Iraq.


There are also suggestions that the IRGC conducted the attacks without directives from the Iranian government or the Supreme Leader. Mohsen Rezaei, a former IRGC commander and current military adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, stated, “Those who oppose negotiations with the United States should restrain themselves and wait,” adding, “The U.S. itself will bring these negotiations to a halt.”


The U.S. government is also reportedly caught off-guard. Citing a U.S. government source, CNN reported, “Everyone was surprised that Iran attacked merchant vessels during Khamenei’s funeral period,” and added, “There were efforts to establish informal communication channels between the IRGC and U.S. forces, but the IRGC has shown a passive attitude.”


There is analysis that the IRGC is seeking to exploit the gathering of hardliners during Khamenei’s funeral period for political purposes. In a separate statement, the IRGC vowed revenge against the United States. Ismail Qaani, commander of the IRGC Quds Force, said in a statement after the U.S. airstrikes, “The procession for Khamenei in Iraq has further fueled our desire for revenge against the United States and strengthened our unity with Iraq,” emphasizing, “Our red line of bloody revenge has become even clearer.”

Follow-up MOU Talks Uncertain...“Chances of an Agreement Now Slim”

AP Yonhap News

AP Yonhap News

View original image

The escalating confrontation between the two sides has cast doubt on the resumption of the follow-up MOU talks between the United States and Iran, originally scheduled for July 11. As both sides accuse each other of violating the MOU and take hardline stances, it is now unclear whether the MOU framework itself can be maintained. The Associated Press analyzed, “The renewed hostilities have placed the interim agreement reached last month under serious threat,” and added, “The latest attacks will make the full reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, reduction of Iran’s nuclear program, and follow-up negotiations for the ceasefire memorandum (MOU) much more difficult.”



Some believe that the various concessions granted to Iran by the United States during the MOU process encouraged Iran’s misjudgment. Michael Singh, former Senior Director for Middle East Affairs at the White House National Security Council (NSC), told The Wall Street Journal, “The range of benefits offered by the U.S. in the hope that Iran would relinquish its control over the Strait seems to have caused Iran to mistakenly believe it could extract more from the U.S.,” adding, “Now that the U.S. has taken a hardline response, the chances for an agreement between the two sides have become extremely slim.”


This content was produced with the assistance of AI translation services.

© The Asia Business Daily. All rights reserved. Unauthorized AI training and use prohibited.

Today’s Briefing