Detention Warrants Denied for Men in Their 20s Who Assaulted Police During Jamsil Protest: "No Risk of Flight"
The two men in their twenties who assaulted police officers during the 'Jamsil Ballot Counting Center Blockade Protest' have avoided detention.
On the afternoon of July 2, Yang Hwanseung, the judge in charge of warrants at the Seoul Eastern District Court, held a pre-arrest interrogation (substantive warrant review) for the two men in their twenties accused of special obstruction of official duties resulting in injury. He dismissed the arrest warrants, stating, "There is no concern that they will destroy evidence or flee."
The suspects are accused of assaulting police officers from the Songpa Police Station on June 5, when ballot boxes from the 6·3 local elections were transferred from the Jamsil 7-dong No. 2 polling station in Songpa-gu to the Olympic Park Handball Gymnasium ballot counting center.
The investigation found that the suspects blocked the officers who had finished transporting the ballot boxes and continued to assault them, claiming that "an election commission employee was disguised as a police officer."
The police identified a total of three suspects and, on June 29, requested arrest warrants for two of them who were determined to have played a major role in the crime.
Hot Picks Today
"After Dominating 80% of the Global Market... China’s Solar Industry Hit with 3 Trillion Won Losses"
- Samsung and SK Report a Surge in Chip Requests... Will Five-Year Big Tech Deals Dispel 'Peak-Out' Concerns? [Why&Next]
- "Fabricated Stories Unveiled Everything... 'How to Make Biological Weapons'—Chilling Security Gaps in AI"
- "Called Her Husband a 'Pedophile'... US Influencer Killed by Estranged Husband After Allegations"
- "One Sip Has Koreans Lining Up for Four Hours... The Remarkable Turnaround of the 1993-Born Chairman [Interview]"
On this day, the defense attorney for the suspects met with reporters and stated, "We acknowledge that physical force was used against the police officers, but requesting detention warrants is excessive." He added, "We cannot accept the 'resulting in injury' part of the special obstruction of official duties charge, as the two-week treatment period stated in the medical certificate submitted by the victimized police officer cannot be recognized as an actual injury."
© The Asia Business Daily. All rights reserved. Unauthorized AI training and use prohibited.