Over 16,000 Calls to 112 and Hundreds of "Not Police, but Doglice" Texts... Woman in Her 50s Sentenced to Prison
Gwangju District Court: "First Trial Judgment Was Appropriate"… All Appeals Dismissed
At Least 43 Situation Room Officers Reported Suffering from Harassment
Hundreds of Text Messages Threatening "Punishment for False Accusation Against a Wea
A woman in her 50s who made more than 16,000 emergency 112 calls over a period of three years—repeatedly hurling abusive and offensive language at police officers—has ultimately been sentenced to prison. Without any particular reason, she not only called 112 but also sent hundreds of harassing text messages to officers' mobile phones, causing them to fear for their safety.
On June 12, the 4th Criminal Division of the Gwangju District Court (Presiding Judge Lee Jeongho) announced that it had dismissed both the appeals filed by Ms. A (59, female), who was indicted on charges including violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, and insult, and by the prosecutor. Ms. A had previously been sentenced to two years in prison at the first trial.
Ms. A was brought to trial on charges of making 16,568 phone calls to 112 from December 2021 to December 2023 in Mokpo, South Jeolla Province, during which she used abusive language and muttered to herself, causing police officers on duty to feel fear and anxiety.
It was found that as many as 43 police officers working in the situation room reported suffering from Ms. A's actions. In addition, from October 2022 to June 2023, Ms. A sent a total of 495 text messages and audio files—including messages such as "You are not police, you are doglice"—to a detective at the Mokpo Police Station, instilling fear.
In January 2024, Ms. A was also accused of visiting the South Jeolla Provincial Police Agency and shouting at an officer. Furthermore, after learning the mobile numbers of officers working in the civil affairs office at a police station, she sent more than 200 text messages, including threats such as "I will have you punished for the false accusation of a weak woman."
In the first trial, the court stated, "The defendant repeatedly made 112 reports over a long period, using abusive and offensive language that instilled fear in police officers, and engaged in stalking behavior. The defendant's actions appear to have caused officers to suffer mental distress and prolonged interference with their work."
Hot Picks Today
"She Comes Every Three Months to Stock Up"... Surge of Foreign Visitors Entering Korea for Olive Young Sale
- "SK hynix Soars Again" KOSPI Recovers 9,100 Level... Market Cap Gap Between Samsung and Hynix Narrows to 30 Trillion Won
- [Report] "Chicken and Cola for 3,000~15,000 Won" Draws Opening Crowd... Surging in Popularity After Leaving the Freezer
- "Forced to Pay 500,000 Won for Team Lunches in a Week"... Company Culture Drives New Employee to Quit, Sparks Outcry
- Foods That Make Your Face Look Worse, According to a Plastic Surgeon... What Ranked Above Ham and Ramen?
The appellate court noted, "The police officers who were victims of the defendant's actions were in a position where they could not easily ignore or block repeated and indiscriminate calls or messages, as they could not ascertain the truth or urgency of the content in advance. The defendant's conduct risked hindering a prompt response to actual emergencies reported to 112."
© The Asia Business Daily(www.asiae.co.kr). All rights reserved.