The Uncomfortable Reality Exposed by the Drama

Laws Are in Place, But Teachers Still Stand Alone

When the Korean Teachers and Education Workers Union was launched in 1989, it put forth the slogan "True Education." It was a declaration to transform the rote memorization-based instruction and classrooms rife with bribery and rigid hierarchies under the military regime into spaces centered on human values. The movement aimed to prohibit corporal punishment and foster a democratic school culture. However, by the 2010s, this phrase had become a cynical code, often used to describe the vengeful glee after punishing someone. The word survived, but its meaning became distorted.


Netflix 'True Education' still cut.

Netflix 'True Education' still cut.

View original image

The Netflix drama "True Education" directly adopts this name. It is a fantasy action series in which school authority supervisor Na Hwajin (played by Kim Muyeol) visits troubled schools and subdues wrongdoers. The reaction from those in education was divided. The Korean Teachers and Education Workers Union called for a halt in production early on, arguing that using violence to educate students is undesirable. On the other hand, the Korean Federation of Teachers’ Associations issued a statement supporting the series, saying it reflects the reality of collapsing teacher authority. These opposing voices say something before the drama does: classroom environments stand atop deeply fractured ground.


This reality became starkly evident in the 2023 Seoi Elementary School incident. After suffering from relentless malicious complaints from parents, a teacher took their own life. Teachers across the nation took to the streets, and the National Assembly passed five laws aimed at protecting teachers’ rights. However, in a 2024 survey, 84% of current teachers responded that nothing had changed. In fact, teacher rights violations that year totaled 4,234 cases, about 3.5 times higher than four years earlier.


The laws were enacted, but the classroom did not change. Even when teachers are insulted by students during class, they hesitate to respond. In a reality where legitimate guidance can turn into a report of child abuse, turning away and remaining silent has become the safe choice. This is why viewers cheer for "True Education." As institutional protections become weaker, the appeal of fantasy grows stronger.


Netflix 'True Education' still cut.

Netflix 'True Education' still cut.

View original image

Screenwriter Lee Namgyu raises the question of who the true victim is in each episode, distinguishing the series from typical vigilante tales by focusing on the damage rather than the roles. However, by pitting teacher authority against student rights, the story can oversimplify complex issues. Reality is far more nuanced. For example, the recidivism rate among "juvenile offenders" is 12 to 13%, about three times higher than that of adults, yet calls to lower the age threshold have not been accepted. The drama resolves such clashes with a single punch, while remaining silent in the face of the structural questions about why harm is repeated.


Policies that prioritize student rights have inadvertently restricted teachers’ legitimate interventions. While the ideal of "True Education" has lost its way in practice, the term itself has also faded in meaning. The flood of post-Seoi Elementary School measures feels hollow in the field for the same reasons. The declarations have been made, but the underlying structure remains unchanged. The public turns to dramas in search of heroes to fill this void.



One thing is certain: "True Education" has brought uncomfortable realities to the surface. Yet, what teachers truly want is not a powerful supervisor. Rather, they seek safe structures: systems where schools and authorities respond together to hostile complaints, procedures that prevent teachers from being labeled as perpetrators before facts are established, legal safeguards to filter out false reports of child abuse, and effective sanctions against violators of teacher rights. These were the original conditions envisioned by "True Education." Though the meaning of the term has changed, the challenges to be solved remain the same.


This content was produced with the assistance of AI translation services.

© The Asia Business Daily. All rights reserved. Unauthorized AI training and use prohibited.

Today’s Briefing