Conflicts Over Free Trials in Everyday Subscription Economy
Government Steps In with Report from Fair Trade Commission and Consumer Agency

Editor's NoteMoney-related issues are among the most common problems people face in daily life, yet it is often difficult to know the exact standards. Many people suffer unnecessary losses due to stories accepted as customs or misinformation. [Misunderstandings About Money] organizes common misconceptions about financial issues in everyday life—such as taxes, fees, contracts, and refunds—based on public data and official guidelines.

"I signed up because it said it was a free trial, but I was charged."


Subscriptions have become commonplace, from OTT platforms to music and app services. While managing them is convenient since payments are made automatically on a set date once you subscribe, the problem is that consumers considering regular subscriptions after a free trial often find the cancellation process or payment amount unclear.


There are numerous complaints from people who missed the cancellation period and ended up being charged, only to find it difficult to get a refund. Many consumers mistakenly believe that after the trial period ends, they will be asked to confirm their intention to make a payment, but in reality, the registered payment account is automatically charged.


To reduce the gap and disputes between consumers—who feel they were charged automatically without prior notice—and businesses—who claim they provided sufficient explanation at the time of application—the main points of contention have been summarized below.

No Automatic Payment with a Free Trial?

Many users see the term "free trial" and assume there will be no cost. However, a significant number of subscription services require payment information during sign-up and are structured to switch to a paid subscription automatically as soon as the trial period ends.


The issue is that this process is often not sufficiently recognized. Even if there is a notice about automatic payment on the sign-up screen, many users fail to notice it.

Photo to aid understanding of the article. ChatGPT

Photo to aid understanding of the article. ChatGPT

View original image

In particular, with services that have short trial periods, payments are made immediately after the trial ends, and complaints such as "I didn't know when I was charged" are frequently repeated. Also, before completing a contract, there may be items that must be purchased separately from the basic fee, or prices may be displayed without including value-added tax, which is not uncommon.


In actual consumer consultations, there are many cases where people only realized they were automatically charged after the free trial ended and requested a refund, only to be denied. For example, one user tried a free trial of an English learning app, missed the cancellation deadline, and was charged an annual subscription fee, but was told a refund was not possible even though they barely used the service.


In another case, a user installed a fitness app and was automatically charged after a few days, but only discovered the payment later and requested a refund, which was denied because "you agreed to the terms of use." When people sign up without fully understanding the automatic payment structure, it often leads to disputes.

Is a Refund Impossible Once Payment Has Been Made?

Just because you have been charged through automatic payment does not mean a refund is always impossible. However, whether a refund is available depends on the payment method and whether the service has been used. In particular, there are policy differences between Apple and Google for payments made via smartphone apps.


For payments made through the App Store, Apple is the party responsible for the transaction, and refund requests must also be made through Apple. Refunds are sometimes granted if the service has not been used within a certain period, but the review process is relatively strict.


In contrast, payments made through Google Play may qualify for an easy refund within a certain period, but afterwards, you must go through a separate process with either the developer or Google. The refund availability and procedure can differ depending on the payment route, even for the same service.


The problem is that many users are unaware of these differences. There are repeated cases of users requesting refunds from the service provider, being told to contact the app market, and then being referred back to the developer by the app market, resulting in confusion over who is responsible.


In addition, if the service has already been partially used, refunds may be limited or only a partial amount may be returned. In the end, after automatic payment, consumers are left with only complicated procedures, starting with having to check "where the payment was made."


In December last year, the Korea Fair Trade Commission and the Korea Consumer Agency jointly published the policy report "Subscription Economy and Consumer Issues," which analyzed current and potential consumer issues in the subscription service market—a key management strategy across industries—and suggested improvement measures.


This report is significant as the first to specifically outline the areas of consumer concern in the rapidly growing subscription service market that businesses and government authorities should pay attention to. The report not only calls for market monitoring but also recommends implementing concrete guidelines and education/publicity so that revised laws are smoothly established in the market, and so that businesses can easily understand requirements such as total price disclosure and simple cancellation procedures.



An official from the Korea Fair Trade Commission stated, "Based on this report, we will continue efforts to strengthen consumer protection in the subscription service market, including proactively pursuing follow-up measures on issues that require institutional improvement."


This content was produced with the assistance of AI translation services.

© The Asia Business Daily(www.asiae.co.kr). All rights reserved.

Today’s Briefing