Supreme Court: "Jeonsal Method" of Slaughtering Dogs with Electric Rod Violates Animal Protection Act
[Asia Economy Reporter Kim Hyung-min] The so-called 'electric slaughter method,' which involves inserting an electric skewer carrying 300 to 500 volts of current into a dog's mouth to slaughter it, has been ruled to violate the Animal Welfare Act.
The Supreme Court's 3rd Division (Presiding Justice Min Yoo-sook) on the 9th upheld the original ruling that sentenced Lee Mo (68), a dog farm operator prosecuted for violating the Animal Protection Act, to a fine of 1 million won with a two-year probation period.
The court stated, "The electric slaughter method significantly infringes on the legislative purposes of the Animal Protection Act, which are the protection of animal life and ensuring safety, and it poses a substantial risk of violating public interests such as fostering respect for animal life. Therefore, the ruling of the appellate court that classified this as a cruel method contains no legal error."
A Supreme Court official commented, "This ruling faithfully implements the legislative purpose of the Animal Protection Act, which is the protection of animal life and the cultivation of public sentiment regarding it."
Lee was prosecuted for slaughtering about 30 dogs annually between 2011 and 2016 at his dog farm slaughter facility by applying an electric skewer to the dogs' mouths to electrocute them.
In court, Lee argued, "I used a method that immediately rendered the animals unconscious so they would not feel pain, so it is not a cruel method prohibited by the Animal Protection Act."
The first and second trials accepted Lee's claim and acquitted him.
However, the Supreme Court did not consider the social conventions specific to dogs and sent the case back with a guilty verdict.
Hot Picks Today
"A Friend Saying 'I Actually Made 200 Million Won with SK hynix' Feels Like Four Weeks' Worth of Pain?"
- "I'll Give You an Extra 1.4 Million Won a Month, But..." Major Firms Make Bold Moves, Even Conservative Japan Is Stirred
- After Finally Repaying 15 Billion Won in Debt, Local Governments Face Another Huge Bill... Aging Infrastructure Keeps Them Struggling [Infra, From Construction to Replacement] ⑦
- Amid 'Four Millionnix' Hopes, Spotlight Returns to the Lone Securities Firm That Set 'One Point Eight Five Million' Target
- 'What's Going On with Daiso Sunscreen?' YouTube Uproar over "30 Million Won Clinical Trial"—The Truth Behind the 'SPF Shortfall' Controversy [Why&Next]
At the retrial held at the Seoul High Court, the court stated, "The defendant did not use a 'humane slaughter method' that immediately renders the animal unconscious when slaughtering, thereby preventing or minimizing pain," and sentenced him to a fine of 1 million won with probation.
© The Asia Business Daily. All rights reserved. Unauthorized AI training and use prohibited.